This website uses cookies

Read our Privacy policy and Terms of use for more information.

Decision & Choice | Commitment Devices

THE THOUGHT

Everything in my closet is black, with occasional concessions to white and beige.

This was a decision. Decades ago I got tired of standing in front of the closet every morning. So I removed the question. Everything matches everything. I get dressed in ninety seconds and think about it never again. The rule works. It has held through many closets and many job changes.

But among the hanging gradient of neutrals, lives one pink sweater.

I bought it six years ago. I remember holding it up in the store and thinking it looked like someone I might be. Yet I have never worn it.

By my own rule it should not be there. Every year or so the closet gets emptied onto the bed, and the sweater goes back on the shelf. It costs nothing to keep it. The closet is not full. Nobody is asking for the space. Maybe one day I will wear pink.

Except six years is a long time for maybe.

I removed the choice from my mornings. The alternative remains in my closet.

What have you left open?

Throw your soldiers into positions whence there is no escape.

—Sun Tzu

THE DIVE

Price of Maybe

Odysseus knew what would happen when the singing started. He would hear the Sirens, change his mind, and ask to be released. So before he could become that man, he had himself tied to the mast.

That is the basic logic of a commitment device. You make a choice while you still want it, then remove some of your ability to choose differently later. Automatic savings remove the money before you see it. A non-refundable deposit makes changing your mind expensive. Telling someone the date puts your word at stake.

They work.

In one study, smokers were offered a savings account with an unusual condition: they could deposit their own money, but would lose it if they later failed a nicotine test. A year later, the people offered the account were more likely to pass an unannounced test.

Only eleven percent agreed to open one.

It is one thing to know you may change your mind. It is another to put money on it.

***

Part of the reason sits at the entrance.

To use a device, you have to predict your own failure first. You have to name the version of yourself who gives up. We would rather not meet her.

Even when we know an option is unlikely to matter, we dislike watching it disappear.

Researchers built a computer game around this. Players could earn money by clicking through different doors. Eventually, doors they ignored began to shrink. Leave one alone long enough and it disappeared.

So people started spending clicks to keep dying doors available, even when doing so cost them money. Nothing behind the door had improved. The option had become valuable because it was about to stop being an option.

The same instinct runs through our ordinary weeks. The old profile stays live. The number remains in the phone. The draft stays unsent. We keep possibilities we are not choosing because deleting them feels more consequential than ignoring them.

That feels like flexibility. A subscription we can cancel. A plan we can adjust. It also means the decision never quite gets to become the past.

***

The effect is easy to test.

Photography students spent an afternoon printing two images they cared about. Then they chose one to keep and one to hand over. Some were told they could swap the prints later. Others were told the choice was final.

Days afterward, the students who could still swap liked their photograph less.

Almost none of them swapped. The chance alone was enough. And when the swap window closed, the gap did not close with it. The dissatisfaction stayed.

One group was learning to live with a decision. The other was still holding it up against the thing they gave away. Given a description of both versions beforehand, two thirds chose the changeable one.

INNER LAB

Spending the Unearned

Workers who refused to save more today agreed to save part of every future raise instead. They never felt the loss. Their savings rate started at 3.5 percent. Where did it land after forty months?

Login or Subscribe to participate

THE SHIFT

Under Review

Making a choice does not always end the choosing.

You can take the job and keep the listings open. You can move to a city and keep calling it temporary. You can stay with someone while quietly maintaining the life you would return to without them. The decision is made. Part of it stays under review.

So commitment may not arrive at the moment of choosing. It may arrive later, when you stop measuring what you have against what you turned down. For some choices that moment comes within a week. For others it never comes at all.

The comparison is what costs you. It keeps what you chose provisional. You invest less because the alternative is still available, and the alternative stays available because you never invested.

So look for the choices that are still being compared. Look for the ones you have made and remade quietly, every year, without ever deciding again.

An open door does not have to be walked through to change the room.

You are paying for the life you did not choose, and the payment comes out of this one.

NOTEWORTHY

  • Read: Ulysses and the Sirens by Jon Elster — The philosophical case for binding yourself, and where it fails.

  • Listen: Save Me From Myself from Freakonomics Radio — A gambler bans himself from casinos, then wins a jackpot anyway.

  • Read: Carrots and Sticks by Ian Ayres — How commitment contracts actually get built, from the man who built them.

This is a space for exploration and reflection, not medical, psychological, or therapeutic advice. Each reader’s situation is unique and deserves the right kind of support. If you are struggling or in crisis, please contact a licensed mental health professional. This edition contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you.