In partnership with
Decision & Choice | Status Quo Bias
THE THOUGHT
Objects in motion stay in motion. So do choices.
Wayne only eats at McDonald's.
I used to think he was scared of new food. But he is not scared. When friends suggest trying local places, he has his reasons. McDonald's is consistent. He knows what he is getting. Why risk a bad meal when you could have something reliable?
He feels this way on a trip to Osaka. He feels this way in his Calgary home.
I watch him defend his choice with conviction. No embarrassment. No apology. He questions the culinary adventurers, the risk-takers, the explorers. Why gamble when certainty sits down the street?
It is not avoidance but genuine preference. The choice just feels right.
I wonder how many of our preferences are Wayne's McDonald's. How many things do you choose simply because they are familiar?
The chains of habit are too weak to be felt until they are too strong to be broken.
THE DIVE
The Comfort of Standing Still
Status Quo Bias is our tendency to prefer the current state of things, even when better options exist.
You sit in the same seat at every meeting. No one assigned it to you. You just do. You order the same dish every time. You ordered it once and now it feels right.
In 1988, economists William Samuelson and Richard Zeckhauser ran a thought experiment. Participants imagined inheriting an investment portfolio and deciding how to re-allocate it across four funds. When all choices were presented neutrally, selections spread evenly. But when one fund was randomly framed as the investment already in the account, most people left it untouched. A fictional “current” holding was enough to make the status quo feel safe.
The pattern lives outside the lab. In countries with opt-out organ donation, 98% of people are donors vs 15% in opt-in countries. With automatic 401(k) enrollment, participation rates jumped, even though 68% of employees knew they were saving too little, only 3% had actually started saving more before the change.
Our phone apps still sit where we placed them years ago. We swipe past the ones we never use. We could reorganize in 30 seconds. We won't. Our commute route. Our morning coffee order. Our side of the bed. One-time choices. Accidents that stuck. Habits that formed. The bias treats them all the same.
Status Quo Bias The Illusion of Preference
This mechanism exists to protect us from decision fatigue. Every choice burns mental energy. Our brain treats "what already is" as safe. But in the modern world, staying might be the risky choice.
The job we complain about every Sunday night. The relationship that stopped growing three years ago. We likely stopped choosing them a long time ago. Yet we stay.
Status quo becomes precious not because it serves us well, but because it already exists.
The bias hides inside the feeling of preference. We think we like our current situation, but what we actually like is not having to decide. We mistake familiarity for rightness. We confuse what is with what should be.
COMMUNITY
THE SHIFT
The Zero-Based Life Audit
Most of us optimize our life. But optimization assumes the foundation is sound. What if it is not?
Try this once a year: pretend you are starting from zero. You have no job, no commitments, no routines. Then rebuild your life deliberately, choosing only what you would actively select today.
Your job. Would you apply for it now? Your city. Would you move there fresh? Your morning routine. Would you design it this way? Go as deep and granular as you want. If it feels overwhelming, pick one small area. An imperfect audit beats no audit.
The question is: what are you keeping that you would not choose? Maybe a belief that is no longer true. Maybe a restaurant you just visit just out of habit.
The transformation happens when you give yourself permission to un-choose.
What would you keep if you were starting over?
NOTEWORTHY
Read: Nudge by Richard Thaler & Cass Sunstein — How defaults exploit status quo bias and why automatic renewals keep you subscribed.
Watch: How to Make Hard Choices by Ruth Chang — An explanation, with over 10 million views, on why we drift through major life decisions instead of actively choosing them.
Read: Thinking, Fast and Slow by Daniel Kahneman — Nobel Prize-winning explanation of why losses loom larger than gains in our minds.
COMMUNITY
SUPPORT THE THOUGHT
If these reflections resonate with you, consider forwarding them to someone who might need to hear this. And if you would like to support the research and writing behind each edition, you can fund the next exploration.
This edition contains affiliate links. As an Amazon Associate, we may earn from qualifying purchases at no additional cost to you. Thank you for supporting our newsletter!